I believe that for many students with special needs there are many behaviors, from speaking out of turn to physical acting out, which are not fully culpable and should in no way be treated as criminal or subject to the ordinary code of conduct of schools. This statement is my personal gloss and a version of what the law states. Having stated that, when children with special needs act out especially when it is highly inappropriate or injurious to self or others, that occasion presents a critical teachable moment which does not necessarily include punishment. Crafting that teachable moment requires balanced team decision-making. Unfortunately that decision-making is frequently after a serious behavioral episode, when staff, parents and student are all in a highly agitated state and balanced and rationale discussions are not on the menu of options.
On many occasions I have discussed and debated discipline and behavioral planning with opposing counsel. Not surprisingly the balance seems clearer to them; their first and primary responsibility is to maintain order, with punishment being a required element. I believe that the law and common sense demand a much more complicated balance, weighing many factors including the student's disability and how to best modify behaviors. Of course, we as parents have an important role as well, which realistically should not include writing our children a blank check because he or she is disabled. The optimum outcome of the special education process is that our children come out of the system to move into adulthood with foundational skills academically and vocationally, but even more with the ability to behave appropriately.
A recent New York Times story, documents a few of the worst abuses of behavioral intervention in schools in the U.S. and Canada in the recent past. Balanced approaches, at times of crisis, go out the window. At these times people get hurt or even killed; often the person on the losing end is the child with special needs. Dr. Peterson, a Professor of Special Education, nevertheless, struck a hopeless note regarding behavioral intervention when he stated:
“It’s damned if you do, damned if you don’t,” Dr. Peterson said, and
it reflects the level of confusion there is about this whole issue.”
Personally, I do not agree with Professor Peterson. Good training,planning and thoughtful staffing minimizes the risks and increases the potential for good and safe outcomes. There does not need to be so much ongoing "confusion". We know what needs to be done; it is critical that we apply safe, humane and effective means of behavioral intervention.